| 翻訳と辞書 |
| AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications, Inc. ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications, Inc.
AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications, Inc., 172 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 1999) 〔AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications, Inc., (172 F.3d 1352 ), (Fed. Cir., 1999)'',〕 was a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, which had granted summary judgment to Excel Communications, Inc. and decided that AT&T Corp. had failed to claim statutory subject matter with U.S. Patent No. 5,333,184 (the '184 patent) 〔''Doherty, Gerard P., Lanzillotti, Nicholas J. and Paulus, Conrad J. Call, AT&T Bell Laboratories, 'Message Recording for Telephone Systems', (U.S. Patent No. 5,333,184 )'', (1992)〕 under . The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit remanded the case for further proceedings.
Along with State Street Bank v. Signature Financial Group,〔 this case was the most referred case on business method patent with a 'useful concrete and tangible result' test by US Courts until ''Bilski v. Kappos''.〔''Bilski v. Kappos'', 561 U.S. 593, 130 S. Ct. 3218 (2010).〕 authoritatively overruled it.
==Background==
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|